Women in Science Program

Resources

Women in Science Article Bibliography

Alper, J. 1993. The pipeline is leaking women all the way along. Science. 260: 409–411.

Bae, Y., and Smith, T. M. 1997. Findings from the conditions of education 1997: Women in mathematics and science:No. 11. Ed. Pratt, R., Rittenhouse, G., Livingston, A., Madden, K., Kridl, B. Washington DC: National Center for Education Statistics. Available online at: http://nces.ed.gov/pubs97/97982.pdf

Baker, D. 1983. Can the difference between male and female science majors account for the low number of women at the doctoral level in science? Journal of College Science Teaching.102–107.

Baker, S. W. 1980. Review Essay: Biological influences on human sex and gender. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society. 6(1): 80–96.

Banziger, G. 1992. Women-in-the-sciences program at Marietta College: Focusing on math to keep women in science. Journal of College Science Teaching. 21(5): 279–281.

Barinaga, M. 1993. Feminists find gender everywhere in science. Science. 260: 392.–393.

Barinaga, M. 1993. Is there a ‘female style’ in science? Science 260, 384.–391.

Bleier, R. 1987. Science and belief: A polemic on sex differences research. The Impact of Feminist Research in the Academy. Ed. Farham, C. Indiana UP. 110–130.

Brown, M. W. 1999. Scientists at work: Lene Vestergaard Hau: He puts the brakes on light. The New York Times. D1–D2.

Brush, S. G. 1991. Women in science and engineering. American Scientist. 79(5): 404–4 19.

Bunk, S. 1999. International dialogue grows among women. The Scientist. 1,23.

Burns, M. 1993. Service courses: doing women a disservice. Women in Academia. 18–21.

C. E. 1993. Entrepreneurs say ‘It’s better to be the boss.’ Science: 260. 406.

Cancain, F. M. 1992. Feminist Science: Methodologies that challenge inequality. 6(4): 623–642.

Carter, C. 1990. Gender and equality issues in science classrooms: Values and Curricular discourse. More History and Philosophy of Science in Science Teaching. Ed. Herget, D. H. Tallahassee: Science Education and Dept. of Philosophy.

Chadwell, F. A. 1995. Bibliography. Teaching the Majority: Breaking the Gender Barrier in Science, Mathematics and Engineering. Ed Rosser, S. V. New York: Teachers CP.231–239.

Chickering, A. W., and Gamson, Z. F. 1987. Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. American Association of Higher Education Bulletin. 6–10.

Chomicka, D., Truchan, L., and Gurria, G. 1992. The “Women-in-Science Day” at Alverno College: collaboration that leads to success. Journal of College Science Teaching. 21(5): 306–309.

Collea, F. P. 1990. Increasing minorities in science and engineering: A critical look at two programs. Journal of College Science Teaching. 20(1): 31–34,41.

Cruz, Y. P. 1997. Research and teaching at a liberal arts college. Women in Cell Biology. 20: (4) 70–78.

Culotta, E., Kahn, P., Koppel, T., and Gibbons, A. 1993. Women struggle to crack the code of corporate culture. Science. 260(5106): 398–404.

Dartmouth College. 1992-93. The women in science project: A bold new initiative in education. Hanover: Dartmouth College.

Didion, C. J. 1993. Attracting graduate and undergraduate women as science majors. Journal of College Science Teaching. 22(6): 336,368.

Didion, C. J. 1996. Motivating women students-the pivotal role of faculty as mentors. Journal of College Science Teaching. 439.

Didion, C. J. 1994. Opening the doorway for women in science: Some personal priorities for 1994. Journal of College Science Teaching. 155–156.

Donner, V. 1999. Women, gender, and science: Scientific interview. Paper printed by Donner, V. April 1, 1999.

Dreifus, C. 1999. Conversation with Rita Cowell: ‘Always, always, going against the norm.’ The New York Times. D3.

Dresselhaus, M. S., Franz, J. R. and Clark, B. C. 1994. Intervention to increase the participation of women in physics. Science. 263. 1392–1393.

Dunn, J. P. Reflections of a recovering lectureholic. The National Teaching and Learning Forum.

Ember, L. R. 1989. Luce Foundation program helps women develop science careers. Chemical & Engineering News. 67(30): 23–25.

Fabricant, M., Svitak, S., and Kenschaft, P. C. 1990.Why women succeed in mathematics. Mathematics Teacher. 150–153.

Fellows, M., Koblitz, A. H., and Koblitz, N. 1994. Cultural aspects of mathematics education reform. Notices of the American Mathematical Society. 41(1): 5–9.

Fort, D. C. 1997. Feminism’s lessons for women in science: Sheila Tobias’ wisdom from outside the field. Journal of College Science Teaching. 53–55.

Grandy, J. 1997. Gender and ethnic differences in the experiences, achievements, and expectations of science and engineering majors. (GRE report No. 92-03). Princeton: Begell House, 1997.

Grossman, W. M. 1998. Cyber View: Access Denied. Scientific American. 279(2): 38.

Guskin, A. E. 1994. Reducing student cost and enhancing student learning, Part II: Reconstructing the role of faculty. Change. 16–25.

Hammonds, E. M. 1991. Under representations. Science. 253(5022): 919.

Harding, J. 1983. How the world attracts girls to science. New Scientist. 99: 754–755.

Harding, S., and McGregor, E. 1996. The gender dimension of science and technology. World Science Report. 3–53.

Harding, S. 1992. Rethinking standpoint epistemology: What is “strong objectivity?” The Centennial Review. 36 (3): 437–470.

Henes, R. 1994. Creating gender equity in your teaching. Ed. McGuinness, N. Davis: University of Ca., Davis.

Hinton, K. 1983. Women in Science. Bull. Sci. Tech. Soc. 3: 313-401, 435–487.

*Hoke, F. 1992. Survey: more women entering chemistry, but career advancement poses problems. The Scientist: The Newspaper for the Science Professional. 6, 16.

Holden, C. 1989. Radical reform to science education. Science. 243(4895): 1133.

Holden, C. 1989. Wanted: 675,000 fixture scientists and engineers. Science. 244(49 12): 1536–1537.

Holloway, M. 1993. Trends in the Sociology of Science: A Lab of Her Own. Scientific American. 269(5): 94–103.

Hornig, L. S. 1984. Women in science and engineering: why so few? Technology Review. 87(8): 31–41.

Hrdy, S. B.1997. Raising Darwin’s consciousness: Female sexuality and the prehominid origins. Human Nature. 8(1): 1–49.

Hubbard, R. 1979. Have Only Men Evolved? Women Look at Biology Looking at Women. Ed.: R. Hubbard, M. S. Henifin, and B. Fried. Cambridge: Schenkman.  7–36.

*Hubbard, R. 1990. The Politics of Women’s Biology. New Brunswick: Rutgers UP.

Hurtado, A. 1989. Relating to privilege: Seduction and rejection in the subordination of white women and women of color. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society. 14 (4): 833–855.

Ivey, E. S. 1987. Recruiting more women into science and engineering. Issues in Science and Technology. 4(1): 83.–87.

Ivey, E. S. 1988. Recruiting more women into engineering and science. Engineering Education. 78(8): 762–765.

Johnson, C. L. 1994. Participatory rhetoric and teacher as racial/ gendered subject. College English. 56 (4): 409–419.

Ju, S. 1998. Science and engineering: The last frontier for women. DePauw Alumni Magazine. 22–25.

Kahie, J. B., and Lakes, M. 1983. The myth of equality in science classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 20:131–140.

Keller, E. F., and Longino, H. E. 1996. Oxford Readings in Feminism: Feminism and Science, (Introduction). Oxford: Oxford UP. 1–14.

Keller, E. F. 1982. Feminism and Science. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society. 7 (3): 589–602.

Keller, E. F. 1985. Gender and Science. Reflections on Gender and Science. 75–94.

Koch, J. V. 1998. How women actually perform in distance education. The Chronicle of Higher Education. 9-11-98: A60.

Koritz, H. 1992. Women and science: changing the climate. Journal of College Science Teaching. 21(5): 260–261.

Koshland, D. E. 1993. Women in science. Science 260. 275.

Koshland, D. E. 1994. Women in science. Science 263. 1355.

Leonard, W. H. 1993. Research and teaching: The trend toward research on the teaching/learning process: Asking the right questions. Journal of Science College Teaching. 23(2): 76, 78.

Lipson, A., and Tobias, S. 1991. Some of our best: Why do college students leave science? The Journal of College Science Teaching. 92–95.

Long, S. R., and Zakian, V. 1994. Women in biomedicine: Encouragement. Science 263 1357.

Lugones, M. Playfulness, “world”- traveling, and loving perception. Doing “Theory”. 390–402.

Lyon, B. 1997. Working to encourage women in science. Chemecology. 26(6): 8–9.

Meschel, S. V. 1992. Teacher Keng’s heritage: a survey of Chinese women scientists. Journal of Chemical Education. 69(9): 723–730.

Miller, R. E., 1994. Fault lines in the contact zone. College English. 56(4) 389–408.

Morell, V. 1993. Called ‘Trimates’, three bold women shaped their field. Science. 260:420–425.

Middlecamp, CM., and Subramaniam, B. 1999. What is feminist pedagogy? Useful ideas for teaching chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education. 76(4): 520–525.

Oliver, D. 1990. Grounded knowing: A postmodern perspective on teaching and learning. Educational Leadership. 64–69.

Osborne, M. 1998. Teacher as knower and learner: Reflections and situated knowledge in science teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 35 (4): 427–439.

Rayner-Canham, G. W. 1999. A tale of two spouses. Chemistry in Britain. 45–46.

Rosser, S. V. 1993. Female friendly science: Including women in curricular content and pedagogy in science. Journal of General Education. 42(3): 191–220.

Rosser, S. V. 1989. Teaching techniques to attract women to science: Applications of feminist theories and methodologies. Women’s Studies International Forum. 12(3): 363–377.

Rothenberg, P. Integrating the study of race, gender, and class: Some preliminary observations. Feminist Teacher. 3(3): 37–42.

1994. Science: Comparisons across cultures. 263. 1467–1496.

Salerno, H. 1997. Mothers of invention: Though unsung and ignored, women have pushed technology’s frontiers. The Washington Post. 3-12-97. H1, H4.

Satow, R., and Vastola, G. 1999. Using female-friendly content to teach women quantitative reasoning. AWIS. 28(4): 6–9.

1997. The Scientist. 11(23).

Seymour, E. 1995. The loss of women from science, mathematics, and engineering undergraduate majors: an explanatory account. Science Education. 79(4): 437–473.

Siebert, E. 1992. Women in science?  Journal of College Science Teaching. 21(5): 269–271.

Shapiro, J. 1999. Shifting the spotlight from center stage. Science. 1464.

Star, S. L. 1979. The Politics of Right and Left: Sex Differences in Hemispheric Brain Asymmetry. Women Look at Biology Looking at Women. Ed. R. Hubbard, M. S. Henifin, and B. Fried. Boston: Schenkman.  113–130.

Stark, J. S., Lowther, M. A., Bentley, R. J., Ryan, M. P., Genthon, M., Martens, G. G., and Wren, P. A. 1989. Planning introductory college courses: Influences on faculty. Ann Arbor: NCRIPTAL. 1–15.

Statkiewicz, W. R., and Allen, R. D. 1983. Practice exercises to develop critical thinking skills. Journal of College Science Teaching. 262–266.

Suiter, M. 1995. Twenty years later… The double bind continues: Diversity forum. AWIS. 24(3): 20–22.

Subbiondo, J. L. 1995. Realigning faculty work with student learning: A proposal for “new American colleges.” 15.

Tavris, C. Measuring up. The Mismeasure of Women. New York: Simon & Schuster. 36–56.

Tobias, S. Disciplinary culture and general education: What can we learn from our learners? Asheville Institute on General Education. 36–41.

Tobias, S. 1992. Science education reform: What’s wrong with the process? Change. 13–19.

Tobias, S. 1990. They’re not dumb. They’re different. A new “tier of talent” for science. Change. 11–30.

Tobias, S. 1990. They’re Not Dumb, They’re Different: Stalking the Second Tier. Tucson: Research Corporation.

Tobias, S. 1992. Women in science. Journal of College Science Teaching. 21(5), 276–278.

Travis, J. 1993. Making room for women in the culture of science. Science. 260(5106): 412–415.

Vetter, B.  1992. Women in Science III: Permanent: Yes, Progress: Maybe, Change: Slow. Mosaic. 23(3): 34-–1.

Wallsgrove, R. The masculine face of science. Alice through the Microscope. 228–240.

Wenneras, C., and Wold, A. 1997. Nepotism and sexism in peer-review. Nature: 387. 341–343.

Xie, Y., and Shaumen, K. 1999. Gender differences in research productivity. The Scientist. 10.

Xie, Y., and Shauman, K. 1998. Sex differences in research productivity: New evidence about an old puzzle. American Sociological Review. 63: 847–870.

*Yentz, C. M., and Sindermann, C. J. 1992. The Woman Scientist: Meeting the Challenges for a Successful Career. New York: Plenum Press.

Zandy, J. 1990. Introduction. Calling Home: Working-Class Women’s Writings. Ed. Zandy, J. New York: Rutgers UP. 1–13.