UNIVERSITY CURRICULUM COMMITTEE

Minutes - REVISED

February 12, 2007



Professor Toni Marzotto called the meeting of the University Curriculum Committee to order at 3:30 p.m. in the Towson Room (Cook 507) of Cook Library.

 

1. The minutes of the December 11 meeting were accepted as written.

2. Professor Erik Scully of Biological Sciences presented a proposed change to the Biology major. BIOL 204, Educational and Career Planning for the Biologist, a one-credit course, would become a requirement. During a pilot period, high-achieving biology students invited to participate in this seven-week interactive online course found it valuable. Students will take the course first semester of their sophomore year (or, for transfers, during their first semester at Towson), after Biology 201 & 202 ideally. The total credit requirement for the major will rise by a single credit.

Professor Leneida Crawford moved and Professor Jay Zimmerman seconded the motion to accept the proposed change. The motion carried unanimously.

3. Professor Craig Johnson, Chair of Psychology, presented a proposed change to the Psychology major. Instead of requiring 4 units of electives at the 300- or 400-level, the department would like to require only 3 elective units at that level as most Psychology courses are actually three units. Majors will continue to take a minimum of 25 upper-level units.

Ms. Tracy Miller moved and Professor Leneida Crawford seconded the motion to accept the proposal. The motion carried unanimously.

4. The Committee turned to the issue of Tracks. Some questions emerged:

  • How unique must the course content of each track be?
  • If uniqueness is a concern, should the uniqueness be measured in absolute credits or as a percentage of credits?
  • If the UCC opts to pin this down, do we need to seek approval or feedback from departments or the University Senate? Professor J. J. Lee thought that departmental feedback would be desirable. Professor Reza Sarhangi asked whether it was unduly punitive to make a hard-and-fast rule. Mr. Giordani pointed out that the University imposes many rules on the campus community!
  • If the UCC adds to the description of a Track, how shall we make this known?

Mr. Bob Giordani distributed a sheet he had prepared showing the unique units for various Concentrations and Tracks, as well as the definitions for Concentrations and Tracks from the last two catalog years. There are wide variations in the degree of uniqueness. The MHEC definition of a Concentration is 24 or more credits; concentrations are meant “to distinguish areas of expertise within a major,” but the degree of acceptable uniqueness is not explored. As of the advent of Peoplesoft, tracks appear on the transcript (as a subplan), just not on the diploma.

The perspectives of students, departments, and employers are important. Professor Leneida Crawford regretted that our student representatives were not here to remark upon how this might impact them. Is it fair to state that Tracks that overlap considerably truly represent specializations? Accreditation should also be kept in mind.

Professor Toni Marzotto delineated possible options:

#1) Add a sentence to the definition in the catalog  to clarify. This addendum could either specify a degree of uniqueness or leave it open to interpretation.

#2) Do nothing.

#3) Consult departmental chairs.

A sense of the Committee tended toward #1, with the exact degree of uniqueness left unspecified. It was hoped that enhancing the definition might trigger departments to consult with the UCC at the outset of the program change process. Two committee members preferred that nothing be done; while two preferred that chairs be consulted.

Ms. Deborah Nolan said that she would draft some language to enhance the definitions of Tracks and Concentrations and send it to the Committee via email after the meeting. Her draft is below:

Concentration (MHEC Approved)

A concentration is a sequential arrangement of courses representing a specialized area of study within a program.  A concentration requires a minimum of 24 units.  A concentration should have enough unique units to distinguish it from the major, a track, or another concentration.

 

Track (Towson University Approved)
A track is a sequential arrangement of courses representing a specialized area of study within a program.  A track requires a minimum of 24 units.  A track should have enough unique units to distinguish it from the major, a concentration, or another track.

In response to a comment by Professor Crawford, Mr. Bob Giordani offered this further revision:

Concentration (MHEC Approved)
A concentration is a sequential arrangement of courses representing a specialized area of study within a program.  A concentration requires a minimum of 24 units and should have enough unique units to distinguish it from the major, a track, or another concentration.  A concentration will appear on the student's transcript as a Subplan upon graduation.

Track (Towson University Approved)
A track is a sequential arrangement of courses representing a specialized area of study within a program.  A track requires a minimum of 24 units and should have enough unique units to distinguish it from the major, a concentration, or another track.  A track will appear on the student's transcript as a Subplan upon graduation.

At least seven committee members responded positively to this wording; expect further discussion at the next UCC meeting.

4. The UCC meeting adjourned at 5:00p.m.

 

Respectfully submitted,

 

 

 

Shana M. Gass

Secretary, University Curriculum Committee